Compare local update sets Administrators can preview local and remote (retrieved) update sets and compare the sets with one another to resolve conflicting changes. About this task Compare local update sets to identify collisions and ensure that the proper changes are being committed. Resolve all conflicts before moving an update set between instances. Procedure Navigate to System Update Sets > Local Update Sets. Select the check boxes beside the update sets to compare. In the Action choice list, select Compare Update Sets. The progress screen appears as ServiceNow generates the collision report.Figure 1. Collision report Click Go to the Collision Report when the report is complete. The Update Set Collisions list appears, showing all the changes in the selected sets. Inspect the list for collisions by locating duplicate Collision Numbers that show the same change in separate update sets. Figure 2. Update set collisios Resolve the collision by deleting the unwanted update record from one of the update sets. Click the link in the Sys update column for the unwanted update (sys_ui_list_incident_null in the example). Click Delete.Note: You must open the update record to delete the record. You cannot delete the update by selecting the check box for the entry in the Update Set Collisions list and using the Delete action. When you delete the update record, the customization is not backed out of the instance. Only the record of the customization is deleted. Figure 3. Customer updates Run the comparison again to make sure all collisions have been resolved. Update set collision resolution A collision is an update that has a newer local update. The platform detects collisions by comparing the values in the Name and Updated fields of the customer update record from each update set. If the name matches but there are different update date values, then there is a collision. When a customer update is moved from one instance to another, it may be re-written to match the target instance. The re-write can involve changing the update name of the customer update and one or more sys_ids within the update. The re-writes are done when the record or the reference field is for a table that uses a coalesce strategy. This ensures that the customer update will be applied to the correct record. For example, if the sys_dictionary record for tablename.fieldname has sys_id 123456789 on instance A and sys_id 987654321 on instance B, when a customer update that refers to that record is retrieved from instance A and recorded in the sys_update_xml table on instance B, references to 123456789 are updated to read 987654321. Coalesce strategies Update sets can detect collisions between identical records that you independently create on separate instances. To detect such collisions, the record must have a coalesce strategy based on coalescing columns. Because collision detection depends on uniqueness of tables, the tables must be unique when the coalescing columns are combined. Records that are not listed here will not collide if the same record is created separately on different instances. Type Coalescing Columns sys_db_object name sys_dictionary name, element sys_choice_set name, element, language sys_documentation name, element, language sys_properties name sys_report_chart_color name, element, value sys_ui_form name, view, sys_domain sys_ui_message documentkey, language sys_ui_list name, view, sys_domain, element, relationship, parent sys_ui_section name, view, caption, sys_domain sys_ui_related_list name, view, related_list, sys_domain sys_ui_view name sys_user_role name sys_wizard name How customer update record names affect collisions To understand coalescing, it helps to understand how records that do not coalesce work. For most record types, when a customer update is moved to a new instance, the system does not detect collisions for the following reason: When you create a record, it receives a unique sys_id. For most record types, the sys_id becomes part of the customer update record name. For example: sysevent_email_template_9e1998c078b71100a92ecacd80df1d39. Creating an identical record in the same table on another instance produces a customer update record name with a different sys_id. For example: sysevent_email_template_10b958c8653311005840134572f8e020 As a result, even though the records might be otherwise identical, the records have different names so the system does not detect the collision. Coalescing records, in contrast, use the following approach to naming records and determining collisions: The following customer update record types use some or all of their coalescing columns instead of the sys_id in their names. sys_dictionary sys_documentation sys_choice_set sys_ui_list sys_ui_related_list The resulting identical record name in each instance helps the system to identify collisions even if the records have different sys_ids. When a customer update is moved from one instance to another, it may be re-written to match the target instance. The re-write can involve changing the update name of the customer update and one or more sys_ids within the update. The re-writes are done when the record or the reference field is for a table that uses a coalesce strategy. This ensures that the customer update will be applied to the correct record. For example, if the sys_dictionary record for tablename.fieldname has sys_id "123456789" on instance A and sys_id "987654321" on instance B, when a customer update that refers to that record is retrieved from instance A and recorded in the sys_update_xml table on instance B, references to "123456789" are updated to read "987654321". Preventing duplicate records Transfer data with update sets rather than recreating it on separate instances to ensure the records have the same sys_id. Export and import records as XML files to ensure the records have the same sys_id. See Export and import XML files. Enable a unique index for the table from the system dictionary. See Table administration. Note: The default records included in the baseline system will always have the same Sys ID because the instance imports the records as XML files during instance provisioning.